Proceedings Ninth Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems
DOI: 10.1109/reldis.1990.93959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of voting strategies for fault-tolerant distributed systems

Abstract: Voting is a fundamental mechanism used in fault-tolerant distributed systems. The diverse applications of voting include for example, n-modular redundant systems, software redundancy, Byzantine agreement, and clock synchronization. The method combines values generated by the processing nodes of a system t o yield a single value. In this paper, the voting problem is studied under a probabilistic model for the behavior of a system. In the case where all values produced by nonfaulty nodes are the same, the optima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several voting strategies. These are majority, median or plurality [3]. At low redundancy factors (N < 7) the implementation of majority voter is more efficient [4].…”
Section: Fault Tolerant Votermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several voting strategies. These are majority, median or plurality [3]. At low redundancy factors (N < 7) the implementation of majority voter is more efficient [4].…”
Section: Fault Tolerant Votermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terminal policies, on the other hand, make the final decision on how to unify the results of the redundant computations. This category includes the adjudicator policy that implements common voting strategies [11]. Currently, our framework includes a (weighted) mean voter, a median voter, and an exact majority voter based on the MJRTY algorithm [12].…”
Section: A Fault-handling Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median voters output the middle and average voters output the average value of the replica output values. Surveys and taxonomies on several voting strategies have been presented [2,8,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%