2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00533.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of two methods for estimating polymegethism in cell areas of the human corneal endothelium

Abstract: A centre-dot method using a small number of cells generates useful data on cell area and ECD, but it should be used cautiously for estimates of COV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low attention on correcting the corners provides a significantly larger random error in the estimates of polymegethism and pleomorphism than the estimate of cell density. This confirms recent similar findings (Oblak et al 2002;Sheng et al 2007;Doughty 2008;Doughty & Aakre 2008;Doughty & Oblak 2008).…”
Section: Standard For Calibration Of Csm Measurementssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low attention on correcting the corners provides a significantly larger random error in the estimates of polymegethism and pleomorphism than the estimate of cell density. This confirms recent similar findings (Oblak et al 2002;Sheng et al 2007;Doughty 2008;Doughty & Aakre 2008;Doughty & Oblak 2008).…”
Section: Standard For Calibration Of Csm Measurementssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A common model for analysing the random error in endothelial morphometry is to divide the random error into inter-system variation, inter-operator variation and measurement error. Inter-system variation, which involves inter-operator variation, has been analysed in several recent studies (Deb-Joardar et al 2007a,b;Hirneiss et al 2007;Doughty & Oblak 2008). Such estimates, unfortunately, are limited to repeated measurements by a number of operators on the same defined clinical material and therefore are limited to that specific clinical material.…”
Section: Standard For Calibration Of Csm Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Various semi-automated and automated methods are available on specular and confocal microscopes that are routinely used to assess ECD. 11,16,17 In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) provides highly magnified images of corneal layers, including the corneal endothelium, 11,[18][19][20][21] even from corneas with advanced Fuchs' dystrophy before grafting 19 or from previously failed grafts with partial opacities. 10 One of the endothelial morphometry programmes available with one confocal microscope (Confoscan CS4, Nidek Technologies, Albignasego, Italy) is the Nidek Advanced Vision Information System software (NAVIS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as importantly, it could be that there are special factors that might determine polymegethism in Asian groups, assuming that the endothelial morphometry was reliable. It is important to note that that at least some commercially available image software systems are prone to error in that much larger COV values (from what might be considered normal) can be readily obtained, even with a single error in a set of cells …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that that at least some commercially available image software systems are prone to error in that much larger COV values (from what might be considered normal) can be readily obtained, 33 even with a single error in a set of cells. 34,35 A more detailed study of endothelia from those of Asian ethnicity was undertaken, including further consideration of how the polymegethism might be related to ECD. Very high magnification prints and manual planimetry were used to essentially avoid any substantial errors in the morphometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%