2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of two laser-based methods for determination of burn scar perfusion: Laser Doppler versus laser speckle imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
104
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…36 This correlation is still acceptable when data are represented as a percentage increase from baseline (for local heating at 36°C, 39°C, 42°C, and 44°C on the forearm of healthy subjects) but decreases when the biological zero value is subtracted. 36 Moreover, Stewart et al 41 reported a very good correlation between LSCI and LDPI in burn scar perfusion assessment in vivo.…”
Section: Correlation Between Lsci and Ldpimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 This correlation is still acceptable when data are represented as a percentage increase from baseline (for local heating at 36°C, 39°C, 42°C, and 44°C on the forearm of healthy subjects) but decreases when the biological zero value is subtracted. 36 Moreover, Stewart et al 41 reported a very good correlation between LSCI and LDPI in burn scar perfusion assessment in vivo.…”
Section: Correlation Between Lsci and Ldpimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser Doppler flowmetry is commonly used to provide a surrogate measure of cutaneous blood flow by measuring red blood cell movement, or flux. This technique provides reproducible dynamic measures of change in red blood cell flux (12), whilst higher spatial resolution variants on this approach include laser Doppler perfusion imaging (37,39) and laser speckle perfusion imaging (5), both of which provide a two dimensional map of blood perfusion, often color-coded to provide a graphical indication of areas of flow. These techniques are all limited in that i) they do not provide direct visualization of the microvascular diameter and outputs therefore reflect, but are not direct indices of, blood flow, and ii) their depth of measurement is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LDI is considered to be a valid measure of burn depth and exhibits high correlation with burn wound histology; yet, current commercially-available laser Doppler imagers are relatively large, require a prolong scanning time, and are not promoted for early diagnosis during the first 48 hours postburn (hpb) [4,7,8]. Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) is another optical technique, related to LDI, which has been used for noninvasive scan-free assessment of burn severity [4,[9][10][11]. In LASCA, a wide-area laser beam illuminates the burn wound to produce speckle from backscatter off the irradiated tissue volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%