2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-021-02053-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the reproducibility of regional precipitation properties simulated respectively by weather generators and stochastic simulation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LARS-WG has many features that make it more suitable for weather projections. Together with the SWAT model, these features include an assessment of risk in hydrological or agricultural applications, the creation of multiple-year climate change scenarios at the daily time scale, better simulation of monthly precipitation extremes, risk analysis of extreme precipitation, easy in transformed data format with the SWAT, and simulation of temperature and precipitation at single climate stations under RCPs2.6, 4.5, 6, and 8.5 scenarios of greenhouse emissions (Yang et al 2021).…”
Section: Lars-wgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LARS-WG has many features that make it more suitable for weather projections. Together with the SWAT model, these features include an assessment of risk in hydrological or agricultural applications, the creation of multiple-year climate change scenarios at the daily time scale, better simulation of monthly precipitation extremes, risk analysis of extreme precipitation, easy in transformed data format with the SWAT, and simulation of temperature and precipitation at single climate stations under RCPs2.6, 4.5, 6, and 8.5 scenarios of greenhouse emissions (Yang et al 2021).…”
Section: Lars-wgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sixth version of the LARS-WG model includes phase five of Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project (CMIP5) and the capability to project climate data into the year 2100 under the RCPs 2.6, 4.5, 6, and 8.5. The model is characterized by the ability to simulate extreme hydrologic events, possess the noises and errors in time series, fill the gaps in time series, interpolate the observation values located outside of the feasible range, and optionally to used specific GCMs [44,45].…”
Section: Climate Change Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water generators are divided into two categories of parametric and nonparametric methods. The parametric method models weather variables using parametric probability distributions while nonparametric generators do not rely on distribution assumptions and parameters (Yang et al 2022a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both parametric and nonparametric methods are capable of generating average weather variables in an acceptable quality, however, synthesising extreme weather variables is challenging for parametric models especially extreme rainfalls (Chen and Brissette 2014; Agilan and Umamahesh 2019a; Yang et al 2022b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%