2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the performance characteristics of classification criteria for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
45
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, while the modified McGonagle criteria (2) were more sensitive than the CASPAR criteria, the same was true of the Vasey and Espinoza criteria (3,4). There was actually no significant difference between the sensitivity of the modified McGonagle criteria and that of the Vasey and Espinoza criteria.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, while the modified McGonagle criteria (2) were more sensitive than the CASPAR criteria, the same was true of the Vasey and Espinoza criteria (3,4). There was actually no significant difference between the sensitivity of the modified McGonagle criteria and that of the Vasey and Espinoza criteria.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This classification also allows one to conceptualize the coexistence of rheumatoid arthritis, a disease related to autoimmune mechanisms whereby the synovium is targeted, and PsA, a disease with a different immunologic basis and a different primary anatomic epicenter of disease. Therefore, our group's criteria may be useful during early disease in patients with small joint polyarthropathy without other enthesitis/osteitis-related features, in whom MRI changes, including diffuse bone edema or extracapsular enhancement, would support the diagnosis of PsA (4,5).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fournie criteria were the most difficult to use and Vasey and Espinoza, and Moll and Wright were the easiest. Vasey and Espinoza, Gladman or McGonagle are the most accurate and feasible in distinguishing RA from PsA [45] . The classification of psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) study group is an international group of investigators, all of whom have records of research in PsA.…”
Section: Psoriatic Arthritismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In der Planungsphase unserer Studie waren wir mit diesem Problem konfrontiert und entschieden uns für die V&E-Kriterien. Diese Kriterien erschienen am besten geeignet für unsere Studie aufgrund der Einfachheit der Anwendung für Fachärzte der Dermatologie bei gleichzeitig in der Literatur angegebener hoher Sensitivität und Spezifität und hoher Rate an Fallklassifikation [10]. Taylor et al [10] diskutieren die Charakteristika verschiedener Klassifikationsvorschläge und schließen, dass die V&E-Kriterien vor der CASPAR-Ära als am güns-tigsten bezüglich Praktikabilität, Sensitivität und Spezifität angesehen werden kön-nen.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified