2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the performance of various project control methods using earned value management systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the continuous update of the longest path for a project in progress requires the detailed knowledge of activity durations and hence information at the lowest level of the WBS, and therefore, this LP method can no longer be classified as purely top-down. This has been mentioned and investigated in a recent study by [15]. These authors describe and test different control methodologies at different levels of the WBS.…”
Section: Top-downmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the continuous update of the longest path for a project in progress requires the detailed knowledge of activity durations and hence information at the lowest level of the WBS, and therefore, this LP method can no longer be classified as purely top-down. This has been mentioned and investigated in a recent study by [15]. These authors describe and test different control methodologies at different levels of the WBS.…”
Section: Top-downmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As mentioned before in literature, authors in [3] and [12] applied buffer management concept in EVM method to produce a new tolerance limits for SPI (t) and SV (t) metrics. In this section, we applied EVM concepts to construct an improved buffer monitoring system.…”
Section: Integration Of Buffer Monitoring System and Earned Value Manmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [8] author incorporated the activity sensitivity measure into the buffer monitoring process, enabling the management team to estimate the risk of project delays on the whole and to identify high-risk activities in particular when taking expediting actions. In [3] the application of buffer concept from critical chain management in earned value management/ earned schedule (EVM/ES) is illustrated and linearly tolerance limits were proposed for the EVM/ES schedule performance metrics SPI (t) and SV (t). In the other research, authors set tolerance limits for EVM/ES schedule performance metrics EVM/ES by allocating project buffer over the different project phases and new metrics have been developed [12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• EVM/ES on multiple control points: The use of EVM/ES control metrics applied at different (and multiple) control points in the project schedule has recently been discussed by Colin and Vanhoucke [57]. Inspired by the concepts of the critical chain/buffer management (CC/BM) methodology, different control points throughout the project are suggested at which EVM/ES control charts should be monitored.…”
Section: Comparing Statistical Project Control To Traditional Evm/esmentioning
confidence: 99%