2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-005-7488-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the performance of calorimeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following study, our goal was to determine if intrinsic differences such as cell geometry, cell volume, and stirring mode between two calorimeters (TAM III and VP‐ITC) have an impact on experimental results. Insights into the comparison of various commercially available calorimeters and the involved statistical treatment are given in the previous study . For comparison, TAM III data for the measurements at 308 K is taken from .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following study, our goal was to determine if intrinsic differences such as cell geometry, cell volume, and stirring mode between two calorimeters (TAM III and VP‐ITC) have an impact on experimental results. Insights into the comparison of various commercially available calorimeters and the involved statistical treatment are given in the previous study . For comparison, TAM III data for the measurements at 308 K is taken from .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colorimetric molybdate method is inappropriate for the mixing process of potassium silicate solution with silica sol under stirring. However, isothermal heat conduction microcalorimetry is a powerful tool to investigate complex systems; [7][8][9] this technique exhibits numerous applications, [10][11][12][13][14] but has not yet been used in silica polymerization reactions. In this paper, according to the equation, A+B→C, using accessible data of power (Φ) and heat output (q), the change in enthalpy during the chemical reaction of the silica sol (A) and potassium silicate (B) was first calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%