1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02665477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the mechanical properties and microstructures of intermetallic matrix composites fabricated by two different methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tensile failure mechanisms in continuous fiber reinforced metal matrix composite have been proposed in either cumulative failure or non-cumulative failure. 9) Since the fibers have a scattered strength distribution, as evidenced by the data in Fig. 3, it is expected that some fibers will break at very low stresses.…”
Section: Tensile Properties Of Tmcsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tensile failure mechanisms in continuous fiber reinforced metal matrix composite have been proposed in either cumulative failure or non-cumulative failure. 9) Since the fibers have a scattered strength distribution, as evidenced by the data in Fig. 3, it is expected that some fibers will break at very low stresses.…”
Section: Tensile Properties Of Tmcsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1,2) Currently employed TMCs manufacturing processes include solid-state diffusion bonding processes, such as powder cloth and foil-fiber-foil as well as matrix coated monotapes and matrix coated fiber produced by plasma spraying and electron beam evaporation respectively. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The demanding requirements during TMCs processing are minimum fiber damage and matrix-fiber interaction, control over fiber alignment and spacing, and good matrix properties, all of which are critical factors in determining the mechanical properties of TMCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because fiber strength dominates the 0° composite strength, distinctions between processes must be made using the same-or an equivalent-strength fiber lot. One of few such studies made has found equivalent 0°s trength between composites made by powder cloth and plasma spray (MacKay et al, 1994), two very dissimilar processes. This observation was explained by the fact that equivalent strengths were measured in fibers extracted from the composites, even though plasma spraying had produced some exfoliation of the carbon coating.…”
Section: Polymer Matrix Composites*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two thermal-spray processes, arc and plasma spray, share an advantage in uniform fiber placement, but possible long-time fiber degradation due to some exfoliation of the carbon coating must be explored. Of the powderbased processes, both tape casting and the powder-cloth method utilize polymer binders that must be removed prior to final consolidation, although impurity levels in laboratory coupons have been equal to or lower than those measured in MMCs made by competing processes (MacKay et al, 1994). Tape casting is probably to be favored over the powdercloth method as a more continuous process.…”
Section: Polymer Matrix Composites*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LPPS allows a variety reinforced composites. [1,2,3] Ceramic fibers, such as SiC or of matrices to be sprayed including Al, Ti, and MoSi 2 based Al 2 O 3 , possess a wide spread of strengths because of inherent alloys. [6,[12][13][14][15] This technique has been further developed by internal/surface flaws, which are usually assumed to be ranthe authors to manufacture a multilayer, circumferentially domly distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%