1991
DOI: 10.1016/0148-6195(91)90009-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the market model and random coefficient model using mergers as an event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others (e.g. Iqbal and Dheeriya 1991) have attempted to improve the estimation of beta risk by using mergers as an event and calculating the beta by a random coefficient regression model (see the methods of Swamy 1970;Pagan 1980), which is more indicative than OLS estimation when the assumptions underlying OLS do not hold.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others (e.g. Iqbal and Dheeriya 1991) have attempted to improve the estimation of beta risk by using mergers as an event and calculating the beta by a random coefficient regression model (see the methods of Swamy 1970;Pagan 1980), which is more indicative than OLS estimation when the assumptions underlying OLS do not hold.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the random beta model gains its momentum (e.g. Iqbal and Dheeriya 1991;Brooks et al 1992;Lin et al 1992). To show the beta's time-varying nature, the beta coefficient is specified as a variable mean response (VMR) process.…”
Section: A the Variable Mean Response Transformation Of The Icapmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engle (1982) which was later modified into GARCH by Bollerslev (1986). Stock markets are associated with the element of uncertainty and due to such uncertain circumstances; investors prefer to forecast the performance of the market (Alam, Siddikee, & Masukujjaman, 2013;Akhtar & Khan, 2016 Iqbal and Dheeriya (1991) suggested that any abnormal returns in the market are because of the market risk and their distribution has a constant variance but Giaccoto and Ali (1982) contradicted such assumptions and argued that abnormal returns can be because of heteroscedasticity which is due to non-constant variance. Akgiray (1989) (Corhay & Rad, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these assumptions is that die coefficients of the market model are constant over time. This has been questioned by Iqbal and Dheeriya (1991) who employed a random coefficient regression model allowing betas to vary over time. They argued that the differences in abnormal returns obtained using the market model and their model can be attributed to the randomness in the beta coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%