The objective of the paper is to investigate whether price indices of different European stock markets display a common long-run trending behaviour. Using cointegration analysis, we provide empirical evidence of common stochastic trends among five important European stock markets over the period 1975-1991.
Stock returns series generally exhibit time-varying volatility. Therefore, one can cast doubt on the way abnormal returns are calculated and consequently interpreted in traditional event studies. In this paper we apply a market model which accounts for GARCH effects leading to more efficient estimators. Using a sample of divestitures, we empirically investigate how this adjustment affects the magnitude of the abnormal returns associated with an event.
This paper tests the performance of 2894 hedge funds in a time period that encompasses unambiguously bullish and bearish trends whose pivot is commonly set at March 2000. The database proves to be fairly trustable with respect to the most important biases in hedge funds studies, despite the high attrition rate of funds observed in the down market. An original ten-factor composite performance model is applied that achieves very high significance levels. The analysis of performance indicates that most hedge funds significantly outperformed the market during the whole test period, mostly thanks to the bullish subperiod. In contrast, no significant underperformance of individual hedge funds strategies is observed when markets headed south. The analysis of persistence yields very similar results, with most of the predictability being found among middle performers during the bullish period. However, the 'Market Neutral' strategy represents a remarkable exception, as abnormal performance is sustained throughout and significant persistence can be found between the 20% and 69% best performers in this category, probably thanks to an extreme adaptability and a very active investment behaviour.
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
AbstractThis article examines the long run performance of initial public offerings (IPOs) in Malaysia over the four-year period between 1992 and 1996. In particular, the study investigates whether the growth/value effect exists. By analysing the sample of 258 IPOs, it can be concluded that IPOs tend to outperform the market with a positive cumulative adjusted market return (CAR) of 41.7% over three years from the listing day. The results are contradictory to general empirical findings in other countries. As expected, growth IPOs underperform value IPOs when the IPOs are sorted using book-to-market equity ratio (B/M), earnings-to-price ratio (E/P) and cashflows-to-price ratio (C/P). Nonetheless, it should be pointed out that both value and growth IPOs generate higher returns than the market. The regression results indicate positive relationship between CAR and book-tomarket equity (B/M). Similar results are derived for earnings-to-price (E/P) and cashflows-to-price (C/P). In addition to this, the size of an IPO is found to be inversely related to CAR.
This paper attempts to model the distributional properties of daily stock returns on several European Stock Exchanges. The empirical findings reveal the presence of non‐linear dependencies that cannot be captured by the random walk model. A model of return‐generating process that fit the data empirically is the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedastic GARCH (1,1) process with a conditional student‐t distribution.
In this paper, we investigate the long run relationship among five major Pacific-Basin stock markets. We focus on the common long run behaviour of their stock price indices over a sample period of 20 years. Using cointegration theory, we find that while there exists a rather integrated Pacific Basin financial area, the regional aspects (Asian versus Pacific) play important roles.
In this article, we test wealth effects of international acquisitions using a sample of foreign acquisitions by Dutch firms during the period 1990-96. We find weak evidence that cross-border acquisitions are wealth-creating corporate activities, especially for acquisitions in the U.S. We observe further that for the West European acquisitions, benefits from internalization are larger for companies having relatively less international exposure and making acquisitions outside of their main activities.
This paper tests the performance of 2894 hedge funds in a time period that encompasses unambiguously bullish and bearish trends whose pivot is commonly set at March 2000. The database proves to be fairly trustable with respect to the most important biases in hedge funds studies, despite the high attrition rate of funds observed in the down market. An original ten-factor composite performance model is applied that achieves very high significance levels. The analysis of performance indicates that most hedge funds significantly outperformed the market during the whole test period, mostly thanks to the bullish subperiod. In contrast, no significant underperformance of individual hedge funds strategies is observed when markets headed south. The analysis of persistence yields very similar results, with most of the predictability being found among middle performers during the bullish period. However, the 'Market Neutral' strategy represents a remarkable exception, as abnormal performance is sustained throughout and significant persistence can be found between the 20% and 69% best performers in this category, probably thanks to an extreme adaptability and a very active investment behaviour.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.