1991
DOI: 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90516-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the effects of alternating current electronarcosis, rectified current electronarcosis and chemical anaesthesia on the blood physiology of the freshwater bream Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters)—II. the effect on haematocrit, haemoglobin concentration, red cell count, mean cell volume, mean cell haemoglobin and mean cell haemoglobin concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haematological and plasma values of the gilthead seabream obtained here could only be compared with other species, since no data were found in the literature for this species. Consequently, the data obtained in this study could be useful as reference values for further studies, although comparisons must be taken with caution because, as has been well established, remarkable differences can be obtained depending on sampling methods (Hoffmann et al, 1982;Korcock et al, 1988;Barham & Schoonbee, 1991) and seasonal or environmental conditions (Van Vuren & Hattingh, 1978;Lochmiller et al, 1989;LeaMaster et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Haematological and plasma values of the gilthead seabream obtained here could only be compared with other species, since no data were found in the literature for this species. Consequently, the data obtained in this study could be useful as reference values for further studies, although comparisons must be taken with caution because, as has been well established, remarkable differences can be obtained depending on sampling methods (Hoffmann et al, 1982;Korcock et al, 1988;Barham & Schoonbee, 1991) and seasonal or environmental conditions (Van Vuren & Hattingh, 1978;Lochmiller et al, 1989;LeaMaster et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%