1992
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400150053009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Regimens in the Prevention of Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different rates of efficacy and safety have been reported, but some of these discrepancies can be attributed to type of prophylaxis (primary versus secondary), administration schedule and concomitant pyrimethamine prophylaxis or antiviral treatment with ddI [ 1 1,191. Once-daily administration of 50 to 100 mg of dapsone is poorly tolerated, with overall side effects ranging from 46% to 75% of patients, although highly effective (failure rates 2.1-6.4%) [10,20,24,26]. O n the other hand, once-weekly administration of dapsone is better tolerated, with side effects ranging from 2.3% to 11%, but less effective (failure rate 8.3-15.2%) [ 22,23,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different rates of efficacy and safety have been reported, but some of these discrepancies can be attributed to type of prophylaxis (primary versus secondary), administration schedule and concomitant pyrimethamine prophylaxis or antiviral treatment with ddI [ 1 1,191. Once-daily administration of 50 to 100 mg of dapsone is poorly tolerated, with overall side effects ranging from 46% to 75% of patients, although highly effective (failure rates 2.1-6.4%) [10,20,24,26]. O n the other hand, once-weekly administration of dapsone is better tolerated, with side effects ranging from 2.3% to 11%, but less effective (failure rate 8.3-15.2%) [ 22,23,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experience with dapsone as an agent for PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected patients has been increasing over recent years. Dapsone has been tested as an agent for PCP prophylaxis at different dosage regimens, namely, 50 to 100 mg daily (4,16,18,22), 100 mg twice or thrice weekly (6,7,29,31), and 100, 200, or 300 mg once weekly (1,11,17,21,25,27). Even though the comparability of these investigations is hindered by such variables as disease stage at study entry, duration of follow-up, concomitant anti-HIV therapy, primary versus secondary prophylaxis, and risk factor, it appears that a daily dosage may be more effective but may be associated with higher rates of adverse reactions than weekly dosage regimens, while weekly regimens may be associated with lower rates of adverse effects and a higher incidence of treatment failures than daily regimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure of PCP prophylaxis both with co‐trimoxazole and pentamidine is uncommon. It was shown in most studies that aerosolized pentamidine is effective for prevention of PCP despite a certain degree of its inferiority compared with TMP/SMX in AIDS and post‐BMT setting (22–26). In a randomized prospective multicentric clinical trial, equal efficacy of aerosolized pentamidine and cotrimoxazole for PCP prophylaxis was shown in HIV‐infected patients (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%