2000
DOI: 10.1006/jema.1999.0331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the costs and benefits of radon remediation programmes in new and existing houses in Northamptonshire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 demonstrates that the choice of 200 Bq m −3 as an Action Level is in itself a compromise, as there will continue to be some radon-induced lung cancers in the population whose houses would not be recommended for remediation. Table 5 also includes updated results from the analysis [14] of the benefits of a radon-proof membrane required by UK Building Regulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 5 demonstrates that the choice of 200 Bq m −3 as an Action Level is in itself a compromise, as there will continue to be some radon-induced lung cancers in the population whose houses would not be recommended for remediation. Table 5 also includes updated results from the analysis [14] of the benefits of a radon-proof membrane required by UK Building Regulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bradley et al [29] summarised results up to 1997, indicating that 6.3% of houses tested in Northamptonshire were above the Action Level. This result was used to estimate the total number of houses in the county which would be found over the Action Level, and this value was used in our previous studies [12][13][14][15][16]. Recently published NRPB work [7], based on detailed analysis of their accumulated test results, provides predictive analysis of the number of homes likely to be at or to exceed the Action Level in radon Affected Areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, research into whether installing membranes in new properties is cost-effective is limited to one study [13]. In contrast, several, among them [3] and [14][15][16][17][18], have investigated the cost-effectiveness of remediating existing properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus it is of paramount importance to focus on the work, which may help mitigate the radon health hazards by decreasing the average indoor radon levels. Many of the cost-mitigation techniques were studied by different workers using various ventilation methods and insulating materials [8,9]. But some of such methods may lead to the increasing the cost of construction and electric power consumption while, some other cannot be applied for existing house.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%