2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost-effectiveness of radon-proof membranes in new homes: A case study from Brixworth, Northamptonshire, UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Davidson, Nicol [ 34 ]; cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA), which estimate an incremental cost per change in a single health outcome arising from an intervention e.g. Coskeran, Denman [ 35 ]; cost-utility analysis (CUA), a CEA for which the Health related Quality of Life (HrQoL) outcome measure has been converted to a Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) e.g. Frick, Kung [ 36 ], and cost-consequence analyses (CCA) e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davidson, Nicol [ 34 ]; cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA), which estimate an incremental cost per change in a single health outcome arising from an intervention e.g. Coskeran, Denman [ 35 ]; cost-utility analysis (CUA), a CEA for which the Health related Quality of Life (HrQoL) outcome measure has been converted to a Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) e.g. Frick, Kung [ 36 ], and cost-consequence analyses (CCA) e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the measure(s) of cost-effectiveness used in this paper, more general measures of cost-effectiveness are 'cost per life-year gained' or 'cost per QALY gained'. These are often used to assess the cost-effectiveness of health interventions and have recently been applied by our group to the question of assessing the cost-effectiveness of domestic radon remediation programmes (Coskeran et al 2006a(Coskeran et al , 2006b(Coskeran et al , 2007. The studies confirmed the results of Denman et al (2002) by showing domestic radon remediation programmes to be cost-effective relative both to other health interventions for which cost-effectiveness results were available and to the 'threshold' level of £30 000 per QALY gained associated with the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another mitigation method for controlling the radon level from the dwellings may be the installation of a radon-proof membrane, especially in new homes. Coskeran, Denman [13] developed a study that demonstrates that, for low radon level, installing a radon proof membrane may be cost-effective in addressing the dangers to health [13]. In many cases, this method is applied with other remedial technique, as a secondary method [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%