2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the chromatographic properties of silica gel and silicon hydride modified silica gels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the elution of peptides 3, 4, 5, and 6 could not be achieved within a reasonable time frame until the amount of water was increased to at least 35% v/v in the mobile phase. Recently, Bawazeer et al compared the retention properties of silica and silica hydride phases for bases, sugars, and polar acids using FA or ammonium acetate as mobile phase additives, and found that the silica hydride phases was more retentive than the silica phase for most compounds investigated [32]. Nevertheless, in the present study, the peptide mixture could not be well resolved under the isocratic elution conditions as peptide 1 and 2 coeluted, while peptides 3, 4, 5, and 6 were only partially separated from each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the elution of peptides 3, 4, 5, and 6 could not be achieved within a reasonable time frame until the amount of water was increased to at least 35% v/v in the mobile phase. Recently, Bawazeer et al compared the retention properties of silica and silica hydride phases for bases, sugars, and polar acids using FA or ammonium acetate as mobile phase additives, and found that the silica hydride phases was more retentive than the silica phase for most compounds investigated [32]. Nevertheless, in the present study, the peptide mixture could not be well resolved under the isocratic elution conditions as peptide 1 and 2 coeluted, while peptides 3, 4, 5, and 6 were only partially separated from each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watson et al . reported on the chromatographic behavior of various polar metabolites on a Cogent Diamond™ hydride column in aqueous‐organic mobile phases (pH 6.5) and concluded−without explicitly referring to the hydrolytic stability of the LC phase−that the hydride material differs on its chromatographic performance from bare silica . Our own results (see Supporting Information Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…These results seem to contradict those of Jandera and coworkers who, based on linear structure-energy relationship and Langmuirian models, apparently assumed longterm stability of various hydride-based bonded silicas in a number of water-rich mobile phases (pH 3.2 and at elevated temperatures) to explain the retention behavior of selected polar solutes [26][27][28]. Watson et al reported on the chromatographic behavior of various polar metabolites on a Cogent Diamond TM hydride column in aqueous-organic mobile phases (pH 6.5) and concluded−without explicitly referring to the hydrolytic stability of the LC phase−that the hydride material differs on its chromatographic performance from bare silica [29]. Our own results (see Supporting Information Fig.…”
Section: Silica Hydride Stability a Subject Of Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatographic conditions such as stationary phase (column), mobile phase composition (solvent ratio, pH, salt type, its concentration), and temperature have significant effects on the chromatography behavior of polar compounds under HILIC . Type B silica (Atlantis HILIC Silica) and type C silica (Cogent Silica‐C column) columns were investigated to compare the retention of ME because it has been found previously that type silica C showed higher retention than type B silica column, particularly for basic compounds .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%