1995
DOI: 10.1080/00140139508925152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device

Abstract: A mouse was modified to add tactile feedback via a solenoid-driven pin projecting through a hole in the left mouse button. An experiment is described using a target selection task under five different sensory feedback conditions ('normal', auditory, colour, tactile, and combined). No differences were found in overall response times, error rates, or bandwidths; however, significant differences were found in the final positioning times (from the cursor entering the target to selecting the target). For the latter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
95
1
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
95
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Users had to select targets in a 3D VE in different experimental setups switching from 2D visual feedback to stereo visual feedback, with and without haptic feedback. Results suggested that the haptic feedback provides insignificant benefits in enhancing target selection time especially when stereo graphics is used and are consistent with (Akamatsu et al, 1995), (Cockburn & Brewster, 2005) works. In non-visual setting, the selection task is a quite passive procedure due to the lack of global knowledge of the whole scene; active non-visual selection techniques should provide both a way to show the user the objects available for the selection and tools to select them and to confirm the choice.…”
Section: Ray-castingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Users had to select targets in a 3D VE in different experimental setups switching from 2D visual feedback to stereo visual feedback, with and without haptic feedback. Results suggested that the haptic feedback provides insignificant benefits in enhancing target selection time especially when stereo graphics is used and are consistent with (Akamatsu et al, 1995), (Cockburn & Brewster, 2005) works. In non-visual setting, the selection task is a quite passive procedure due to the lack of global knowledge of the whole scene; active non-visual selection techniques should provide both a way to show the user the objects available for the selection and tools to select them and to confirm the choice.…”
Section: Ray-castingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because of todays technology advancements such as the computer and the smartphone, visual sensation is the more studied field. In most scenarios, visual sensation provides reliable feedback information for the operator [37]. However, due to the blind nature of scoliosis surgery, the visual sensation is limited in providing effective feedback for scoliosis surgery.…”
Section: Virtual Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akamatsu et al [15] researched some user tasks with various feedbacks. They used a haptic mouse for delivering tactile feedback to the user's fingers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%