Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2740-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of self-report and antiretroviral detection to inform estimates of antiretroviral therapy coverage, viral load suppression and HIV incidence in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa

Abstract: Background: Accurately identifying individuals who are on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is important to determine ART coverage and proportion on ART who are virally suppressed. ART is also included in recent infection testing algorithms used to estimate incidence. We compared estimates of ART coverage, viral load suppression rates and HIV incidence using ART self-report and detection of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs and we identified factors associated with discordance between the methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
34
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HIV status-awareness and ART coverage are based on participants’ responses to the survey questionnaire. These two indicators might be underestimated if HIV-positive participants were unwilling to report knowing their HIV status, which might be the case among adolescents in particular ( 7 ). Multiplying the three 90/90/90 target measures from this analysis together (46.3% aware of HIV-positive status x 85.5% self-reported ART use x 81.8% viral suppression among those on ART) produces a viral load suppression prevalence among HIV-positive adolescent girls and young women on ART of 32.4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV status-awareness and ART coverage are based on participants’ responses to the survey questionnaire. These two indicators might be underestimated if HIV-positive participants were unwilling to report knowing their HIV status, which might be the case among adolescents in particular ( 7 ). Multiplying the three 90/90/90 target measures from this analysis together (46.3% aware of HIV-positive status x 85.5% self-reported ART use x 81.8% viral suppression among those on ART) produces a viral load suppression prevalence among HIV-positive adolescent girls and young women on ART of 32.4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain contextual epidemiological parameters, the survey data was analysed to obtain prevalence and treatment coverage proportions, and an initial incidence analysis was conducted, using a standard RITA comprising LAg (≤ 1.5) and viral load (> 100 copies/ml), with MDRI and a crude FRR estimated from CEPHIA data, to obtain an overall incidence in the population of interest. ARV testing was not included in the RITA, as this may have an unknown impact on MDRI, and earlier work using this survey demonstrated limited benefit for FRR and precision of incidence estimates [21]. April 26, 2018 15/26…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STI prevalence is 13%, and young women under age 25 are at significantly higher risk . About 77% of men have not been circumcised , and while viral suppression among those on medication was high among teenagers (68%) and 20‐ to 24‐year olds (87%), overall, ART use was less than 45% among those aged 15 to 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%