2004
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200411000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Radiographic and Scintigraphic Techniques to Assess Aseptic Loosening of the Acetabular Component in a Total Hip Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that substantial interobserver variability exists in assessment of periprosthetic lucency. Prior studies have indicated kappa = 0.37 or a rate of consensus of 46% for acetabular components and 87% consensus for femoral components [4,24]. Additional tests were obtained as needed, eg, CT scan to evaluate for occult periprosthetic fracture or laboratory studies and aspiration to evaluate possible infectious etiology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that substantial interobserver variability exists in assessment of periprosthetic lucency. Prior studies have indicated kappa = 0.37 or a rate of consensus of 46% for acetabular components and 87% consensus for femoral components [4,24]. Additional tests were obtained as needed, eg, CT scan to evaluate for occult periprosthetic fracture or laboratory studies and aspiration to evaluate possible infectious etiology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus publications to date on planar RNA of acetabular cups show poor results. Temmerman et al [3] in their series comparing with plain X-rays and digital subtraction arthrography, showed that planar RNA had a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 67%. Planar RNA has not been sufficiently accurate to use Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature to date on radionuclide arthrography (RNA) has described the use of planar but not tomographic imaging. Studies using planar RNA for assessment of acetabular cup loosening showed inferior accuracy figures [2][3][4][5], and concluded that it is not a suitable technique on its own. We were unable to find published accounts of RNA using SPECT with or without CT image fusion for the evaluation of acetabular cup loosening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital subtraction techniques can be used to increase the sensitivity. Temmerman et al found an increased sensitivity of 15 % compared to conventional nuclear arthrography for the examination of the acetabular component (Temmerman et al, 2004). In contrast to this optimization, arthrography is identified to be non specific for the acetabular component (Köster et al, 1993).…”
Section: Arthrographymentioning
confidence: 99%