Recent Advances in Arthroplasty 2012
DOI: 10.5772/25772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Possibilities for Detection of Loosening of Total Hip Replacements and How Intelligent Implants Could Improve Diagnostic Accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the first ten years of THR, around 10% of all implants are expected to fail, with loosening being the most common reason [2]. The diagnostic approaches to detect loosening are generally categorised into two groups: imaging and non-imaging approaches [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the first ten years of THR, around 10% of all implants are expected to fail, with loosening being the most common reason [2]. The diagnostic approaches to detect loosening are generally categorised into two groups: imaging and non-imaging approaches [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another point for consideration is the measurement system, which has to be adjusted to the resonant eigenfrequencies of the oscillators. The functionality of acoustic sound and structural vibration detection was demonstrated on overdimensioned models [24] and in in vitro studies using porcine forelegs [27,28]. Further work requires the determination of the sensitivity of the passive sensor array to implant loosening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Connor and Kiourti [78] only briefly enumerated three technologies for loosening detection of hip implants. Finally, Ruther et al [28] summarized the current imaging methods used for diagnostic of post-operative total hip replacement and presented ten methods, using mechanical vibrations and acoustics, for bone-implant loosening detection. However, these studies did not perform detailed analyses to all monitoring approaches already proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included are those incorporated inside instrumented active implants or those operating extracorporeally as adjuvant technologies. To date, conventional monitoring of loosening states is performed by imaging methods, such as radiography, arthrography, scintigraphy, stereophotogrammetry, among others [28]. Although these methods are considered accurate techniques to detect loosening states of both cementeless and cemented implants, the clinical follow-up can only be carried out in clinical laboratories, and thus the monitoring cannot be established throughout the daily life of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%