2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of progressive-failure criteria in the prediction of the dynamic bending failure of composite laminated beams

Abstract: Hou and Hashin criteria were compared under dynamic conditions, analyzing the failure of beams subjected to low velocity impacts in a three point configuration. To accomplish this goal a progressive failure model was implemented in a finite element code to predict the failure modes (fibre tensile failure, fibre compressive failure, matrix cracking, matrix crushing, and delamination), considering both Hou and Hashin criteria. The experimental results, from tests conducted in a drop-weight tower and available in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intralaminar failure model was based on Hou criteria [23] and was introduced through a user subroutine VUMAT for the carbon/epoxy laminate. This model has been used widely in the literature (see for instance [24,25]). …”
Section: Drill and Workpiece Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intralaminar failure model was based on Hou criteria [23] and was introduced through a user subroutine VUMAT for the carbon/epoxy laminate. This model has been used widely in the literature (see for instance [24,25]). …”
Section: Drill and Workpiece Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the tension tests, all the fibres aligned parallel to the loading direction are subjected to a uniform stress, and so the weakest fails first. In the bending tests, only the bottom (back) plies experience the maximum tensile stress and the weakest fibres are not necessarily to be located at this region [17]. Similarly, the elongation of 1.96% and 1.9% of the warp and weft specimens, respectively, in bending was higher than their respective values of 1.55% and 1.56% in tension (see Table 1).…”
Section: Discussion Of Flexural-test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Several studies have highlighted that, in general, the flexural strength of a material is greater than its tensile strength [17]. This behaviour is explained as a result of the non-uniform stress distribution through the thickness of the bending specimen.…”
Section: Discussion Of Flexural-test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage initiation and growth in composite structures subjected to bending loads have been studied by numerous researchers, using various FE models [13][14][15][16]. However, these models are usually developed in the context of a static or steady-state crack propagation using implicit FE tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%