A comparison of outcomes of eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: one centre experience

Outcomes Following Carotid Endarterectomy with Patch Plasty Versus Eversion Technique: A Comparative Study of 5 Years of Experience

“…Likewise, there were no significant differences in 30-day hematoma, uncontrolled BP, CHS, stroke, MI, mortality rate, or re-exploration. Our findings were similar to those from several previous studies from different geographical regions of the world [3,[27][28][29]. However, Kumar et al, revealed that the ECE group had a significantly higher rate of CNI than the CEPP group (19.4% vs. 3.2%, respectively, P = 0.045).…”

“…According to previous studies, there were no statistical differences in demographics, comorbidities, or symptoms between both groups [3,[26][27][28][29]. With the exception of a significantly higher prevalence of obesity in our CEPP group, our findings are consistent with those of the above.…”

“…The stroke-related mortality rate following CEA depends on several factors, including patient characteristics and the specific procedure. Our study showed that the overall perioperative stroke and mortality rate was 5%, a figure that is considerably higher in comparison with others' findings of 0.0% as showcased in 0.27% as showcased in and 0.9% as showcased in [3,[26][27][28][29].…”

“…Clinical outcomes from ECE have been demonstrated to be comparable to those from CEPP, including the outcomes presented in our study. Nonetheless, CEPP is still regarded as the gold standard surgical technique worldwide [3,25].…”

“…In lowincome countries like Yemen, stroke is a devastating problem [2]. Among all causes of death, stroke ranks third in the world, with 13,570, or 8.72%, of total deaths in Yemen [2][3][4]. The internal carotid artery (ICA) is confirmed to be the origin of 8% of strokes, or 13.4 strokes per 100,000 people annually [5].…”