This literature review covers the publications of Russian vascular surgeons in recent years and deals with debatable issues of carotid surgery, including: 1. What is the best technique for carotid endarterectomy (CEA)? 2. Why does restenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) develop and how to eliminate it? 3. How to operate on bilateral ICA stenosis? 4. Should carotid glomus be preserved? 5. Is CEA safe in the acute phase of cerebrovascular accident (CVA)? 6. Is CEA safe in elderly patients? 7. How to operate on patients with combined internal carotid and coronary artery involvement? The evidence presented in this publication makes it possible to draw the following conclusions: 1. When choosing a CEA technique, the classical technique with patch angioplasty should be avoided due to the high risk of ICA restenosis. 2. To eliminate ICA restenosis, carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS) should be used. When performing primary CEA with ICA transposition over the hypoglossal nerve, reCEA can be used 3. In the absence of contraindications, bilateral ICA stenosis can be operated at the same time using CEA. 4. CEA with carotid glomus preservation is the operation of choice in the treatment of patients with hemodynamically significant ICA stenosis due to the elimination of the risks of postoperative hypertension and the formation of hemorrhagic transformation. 5. If there are indications for cerebral revascularization in the most acute period of stroke, CEA should be abandoned in favor of CAS. 6. In old age, CAS is the safest treatment strategy. 7. In the presence of a combined ICA and coronary involvement, the choice of treatment tactics should be carried out only by a multidisciplinary commission, taking into account the risk stratification of adverse cardiovascular events.
Introduction. Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults. Despite some achievements in primary tumor treatment, 50% of patients develop distant metastases in various times (3 years to decades). Hematogenous spread is typical for uveal melanoma, and in 90% of the cases liver is the target. Median survival of patients with liver metastases is 4 to 9 months according to various researchers. And the result of treatment is extremely poor, unlike the results of skin melanoma treatment.The aim is to evaluate the immediate results of treatment of patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver using isolated hepatic perfusion technique.Materials and methods. Considering a high risk of developing a metastatic liver disease in patients with uveal melanoma, local therapy is particularly interesting. This article describes the results of 10 metastatic uveal melanoma patients’ Isolated Hepatic Perfusion (IHP) Treatment. IHP was conducted using the standard methods with 100 mg of Melphalan for 60 min.Results and discussion. IHP treatment shows low complication rate. The data for response assessment is available on 9 out of 10 patients, because 10th patient received this treatment less than a month ago. Follow-ups a month after 9 patients underwent IHP showed an objective response to treatment in 6 patients (complete response in 1, partial response in 5 patients).Conclusion. The use of isolated liver chemoperfusion in a small group of patients according to the standard procedure allowed achieving an immediate response in 67% of cases.
The use of an artificial circulation and endovascular technologies in the treatment of liver metastases of uveal melanoma is a highly relevant area. Uveal melanoma is a rare cancer from the uveal tract of the eye. The liver is the most common site of metastasis and is affected in 70-90% of cases, being the only site of metastasis in about 50% of cases. Survival ranges from two to three months. This literature review describes the following methods of treatment of liver metastases of uveal melanoma using a heart-lung machine: arterial (arterio-caval), portal (porto-caval), arterio-porto-caval, retrograde arterio-portal. Special attention is paid to the endovascular method of treatment.Literature sources were searched in the following electronic libraries: elibrary.ru, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, researchgate.net.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.