2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/252/1/012022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of optimal semi-active suspension systems regarding vehicle ride comfort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, this model may also include an anti-roll bar with torsional stiffness kAR, which provides a torque MAR proportional to the roll angle φ as in Eq. (7). The degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the model are the roll and heave motions of the sprung and unsprung masses.…”
Section: Half Car Model (Hc1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, this model may also include an anti-roll bar with torsional stiffness kAR, which provides a torque MAR proportional to the roll angle φ as in Eq. (7). The degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the model are the roll and heave motions of the sprung and unsprung masses.…”
Section: Half Car Model (Hc1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the anti-roll bar is concerned, the torque it provides is calculated according to the Eq. (7), while the force that the anti-roll bar applies to the wheels is given by the Eq. (8).…”
Section: Half Car Model (Hc1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another controller was proposed by Nie et al, 20 achieving a good trade-off between ride quality and road-holding, by using the properties of the invariant points and employing a novel frequency selector. Besides the study of new control algorithms, researchers have conducted extensive surveys of the available control algorithms emphasizing on different methods, such as: (a) the comparison of simulations with experimental results, 17,22 (b) the analysis in the frequency domain, 23 and (c) the comparison of the Pareto Fronts 24 that occur from the multi-objective optimization of semi-active suspensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response time of MR damper is defined as a time needed to reach 63.2 % of the final force. The paper of Strecker et al (2019) describes the construction of the MR damper with response time up to 1.5 ms. Simulations of systems with MR damper were performed and comparisons of control algorithms were described in several studies (Poussot-Vassal et al, 2011;Koulocheris et al, 2017;McManus et al, 2002). In these articles, the response time of the damper is neglected and thus the results can be distorted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%