2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of muscle energy models for simulating human walking in three dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
125
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
14
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second modification was that the total metabolic rate at any time could not be negative (theoretically, total metabolic rate could be negative if the fiber mechanical work rate was negative and exceeded the total heat rate in magnitude). This change was consistent with the argument that eccentric work cannot cause a net synthesis of ATP (Miller, 2014).…”
Section: Metabolics Modelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The second modification was that the total metabolic rate at any time could not be negative (theoretically, total metabolic rate could be negative if the fiber mechanical work rate was negative and exceeded the total heat rate in magnitude). This change was consistent with the argument that eccentric work cannot cause a net synthesis of ATP (Miller, 2014).…”
Section: Metabolics Modelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These models are based on experiments with isolated fiber bundles from mouse and frog muscles. These models predict whole-body metabolic cost for walking and running with reasonable accuracy, but predictions are sensitive to the metabolic model, corresponding muscle model, and neural controller [90,127]. This is an important area for future work as interest in metabolic energy and efficiency grows in the community (e.g., in pathology or for designing assistive devices).…”
Section: Energetic or Metabolic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c) has been used previously to simulate 3D human walking [32] and consisted of 10 rigid segments (pelvis, trunk, thighs, shanks, feet, toes) with 23 degrees of freedom (DoF). The model had a standing height (1.66 m), mass (61.0 kg), and body segment inertial properties [11] representing an adult female.…”
Section: Musculoskeletal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle-specific model parameters were referenced from a cadaver-based lower limb model [4] then adjusted so that the maximum isometric hip, knee, and ankle torque-angle curves were similar to average dynamometry data for adult females [3]. See [32] for details on this parameter tuning method. Muscle metabolic rates were calculated using a model of human muscle energy expenditure [46].…”
Section: Musculoskeletal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation