1985
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90029-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of methods for calculating energy release rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
287
0
13

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 605 publications
(321 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
287
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this problem, Domain Integral (DI) methods [17,18] have been derived by applying the divergence theorem to eqn. (3.2.1).…”
Section: Evaluation Of J and Cto Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, Domain Integral (DI) methods [17,18] have been derived by applying the divergence theorem to eqn. (3.2.1).…”
Section: Evaluation Of J and Cto Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dokładną charakterystykę użytej metody całkowania zaprezentowano w pracy [8], nawiązując m.in. do opracowania [19], gdzie szczegó-łowo opisano zasadę tworzenia ekwiwalentnego obszaru całkowania oraz [20], gdzie omówiono zastosowanie metody wirtualnego przyrostu pęknięcia.…”
Section: Miejsce Inicjacji Pęknięciaunclassified
“…; ; Steinmann (2002b,a); Menzel et al (2004); , . The suggestion in to compute the crack-driving force based on the concept of "nodal material forces" generalized, in fact, the domain integral format suggested previously by Li et al (1985). A posteriori error control and adaptivity of the J-integral in its different equivalent formats were investigated by Heintz et al (2004).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%