1965
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1965.0011183x000500060041x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Methods for Estimating Total Leaf Area of Barley Plants1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2.1. Total leaf area per plant (cm 2 ) Total leaf area per plant was calculated using the formula of Carleton and Foote (1965): leaf area (cm 2 ) = maximum leaf length × maximum leaf width × 0.75, 0.75 = correction factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1. Total leaf area per plant (cm 2 ) Total leaf area per plant was calculated using the formula of Carleton and Foote (1965): leaf area (cm 2 ) = maximum leaf length × maximum leaf width × 0.75, 0.75 = correction factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After twenty days of flower formation five plants in which enthesis has been occured were randomly selected from each replicate and data for plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, fresh and dry weights of shoot and root and number of flowers per plant were recorded. Leaf area was calculated by using the formula of Carleton and Foote (1965). Lear area = maximum length x maximum width x Gorectionfactor (0.399).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Same plants were used to count number of leaves plant -1 . For the measurement of leaf area, fully expanded leaves were selected and their area was calculated by recording their length and maximum width of leaf blade from the center, which were multiplying with constant factor (0.68) according to the method described by Carleton and Foote (1965). Stem diameter was measured from the base of plant (2 inches above soil surface) using digital caliper.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%