2008
DOI: 10.1080/02640410802104920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of lactate indices during ramp exercise using modelling techniques and conventional methods

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the lactate indices provided by single- and double-breakpoint models with lactate thresholds obtained with conventional methods. Arterial samples for the determination of lactate concentrations were drawn from eight participants at rest and every minute during a ramp test (15 W x min(-1)) on a cycle ergometer. Lactate thresholds were determined from a blood lactate concentration equal to 4 mM (LT(4)), from an increase of 1 mM above the resting level (Delta1 mM), and from in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior work has commonly used the INFL method, the 1mM method, and some of its variations (i.e., blood lactate increases of 0.5 or 0.75 mM above baseline values) (16,35,48), which are favored for their relative ease of application and objective nature. Furthermore, these approaches take into account individual variations in the subject's resting steady-state lactate level (which is not the case for the 4mM method).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work has commonly used the INFL method, the 1mM method, and some of its variations (i.e., blood lactate increases of 0.5 or 0.75 mM above baseline values) (16,35,48), which are favored for their relative ease of application and objective nature. Furthermore, these approaches take into account individual variations in the subject's resting steady-state lactate level (which is not the case for the 4mM method).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rest+1,27 28 fixed 2.0 and 4.0 mmol/l markers were determined by linear interpolation within the raw data sets. Because [LA − ] was too high (>2.0) throughout some of the trials, the 2.0 mmol/l marker was indeterminate in seven of 67 trials involving five of the 11 subjects.…”
Section: Treatment Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, several methods exist that can be used to detect the LT, although these methods sometimes produce diff ering estimates on this point [7,22,23] . The existing methods include both subjective methods, such as the visual detection of the LT (LT Visual ) [6] , and objective methods, such as methods based on a fi xed value of lactate concentration [13,15,21] .…”
Section: Introduction ▼mentioning
confidence: 99%