2008
DOI: 10.1080/00207540600972943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of JIT and TOC buffering philosophies on system performance with unplanned machine downtime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, a maximum limit on the number of jobs released to the bottleneck but not yet completed is established and a job is released whenever the number of jobs is below the prescribed limit (e.g. Ashcroft, 1989;Lambrecht & Segaert, 1990;Duclos & Spencer, 1995;Chakravorty & Atwater, 1996;Chakravorty, 2001;Watson & Patti, 2008). There are two ropes: Rope 1 determines the schedule at the bottleneck to exploit the constraint according to the organization's goal (Schragenheim & Ronen, 1990); Rope 2 then subordinates the system to the constraint (the bottleneck station).…”
Section: Drum-buffer-rope (Dbr) and The Theory Of Constraints (Toc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, a maximum limit on the number of jobs released to the bottleneck but not yet completed is established and a job is released whenever the number of jobs is below the prescribed limit (e.g. Ashcroft, 1989;Lambrecht & Segaert, 1990;Duclos & Spencer, 1995;Chakravorty & Atwater, 1996;Chakravorty, 2001;Watson & Patti, 2008). There are two ropes: Rope 1 determines the schedule at the bottleneck to exploit the constraint according to the organization's goal (Schragenheim & Ronen, 1990); Rope 2 then subordinates the system to the constraint (the bottleneck station).…”
Section: Drum-buffer-rope (Dbr) and The Theory Of Constraints (Toc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows different implementation of TOC. Fenbert & Fleener, 2002;Wei et al, 2002√ Dettmer, 1995Ehie & Sheu, 2005;Moore & Scheinkopf, 1998;Nave, 2002;Raimona Zadry & Mohd Yusof, 2006;Siha, 1999;Stein, 1997√ Coman & Ronen, 2000Hilmola 2001√ Aryanezhad & Komijan, 2004Bhattacharya et al, 2008;Fawcett & Pearson, 1991;Fredendall & Lea 1997;Gupta et al, 2008;Lea & Min, 2003;Patterson, 1992;Souren et al, 2005;Umble et al, 2006√ Balakrishnan & Cheng, 2005√ Bhimani et al, 2002Cooper & Slagmulder, 1999;Fritzsch, 2011;Kee, 1995;Kirche et al, 2005;Ioannou & Papadoyiannis, 2004;Jones & Dugdale, 1998Louderback & Patterson, 1996;Schniederjans & Garvin, 1997;Spencer, 1994;Watson & Patti, 2008;Zimmerman & Yahya-Zadeh, 2011√ Bramorski et al, 1996√ Breen et al, 2002Motwani et al, 1996 √…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just-In-Time (JIT) manufacturing outperformed TOC in terms of short-and long-term profitability, customer service, and work-in-process inventory. Watson and Patti (2008) studied the effect of buffering under JIT and TOC to determine whether or not a difference in performance exists in systems encountered with unplanned machine downtime.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work conducted by Sale and Inman (2003) showed that the combined use of JIT and TOC can result in a higher performance if compared to the use of the individual approaches. Patti and Watson (2008) concluded that TOC is more tolerant of variability, has less lead time and needs on average 50% less than the JIT inventory for the same productivity. This information is based on the strategy of focusing on the management of production bottlenecks system, and rather than manage equally all the resources of the productive system.…”
Section: Toc and Leanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works of computational simulation comparing JIT, currently named Lean, and TOC were performed by Miltenburg (1997); Chakaravorty and Atwater (1996); Cook (1994) and Watson and Patti (2008). Miltenburg (1997) showed that JIT operates with less inventory and lead times while TOC generates higher productivity.…”
Section: Toc and Leanmentioning
confidence: 99%