2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of international references for the assessment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity in different populations

Abstract: Objective: To compare different references assessing child and adolescent overweight and obesity in different populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
116
2
19

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(44 reference statements)
12
116
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…This figure is lower than those reported in studies from developed countries (2)(3)(4)(29)(30)(31) , but similar to those documented in studies with the same overweight criterion in China (32,33) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This figure is lower than those reported in studies from developed countries (2)(3)(4)(29)(30)(31) , but similar to those documented in studies with the same overweight criterion in China (32,33) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…difficult because of the diversity of criteria used for the definition of nutritional status since no standard or reference was agreed upon internationally (35) . Different estimates of nutritional status may also be found when factors such as age, gender and also the time at which the study was conducted are taken into consideration, especially in Brazil where rapid nutritional transition has been observed over the past 10 years (36) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direction of the effect depends on age group and national characteristics. 18,19 The decision on which criteria to adopt for the The observation that height continues to increase until close to 20 years in the population used to construct the curve, motivated the choice of this age for BMI outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%