2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-011-1021-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of In Situ Constant and Falling Head Permeameter Tests to Assess the Distribution of Clogging Within Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The form, density and water retention characteristics of the solids effects the free volume available for water movement and therefore the local water content, hence the hydraulic conductivity [25,55]. To determine the hydraulic conductivity two in situ methods can be used, namely the falling head and the constant head method [56].…”
Section: Methods To Evaluate Clogging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The form, density and water retention characteristics of the solids effects the free volume available for water movement and therefore the local water content, hence the hydraulic conductivity [25,55]. To determine the hydraulic conductivity two in situ methods can be used, namely the falling head and the constant head method [56].…”
Section: Methods To Evaluate Clogging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People's Republic of China 1999;Pedescoll et al 2011bPedescoll et al , 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results can be associated with a longer operating time of assessed systems (about two years), which allows a greater porous space occupation with solids from the applied wastewater, detached from the substrate, precipitated, and from the biofilm developed in the system. In other studies, Ks heterogeneity has also been reported, as in PEDESCOLL et al (2012) and RANIERI & YOUNG (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%