2010
DOI: 10.2298/ntrp1001051a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of in-air and in-water calibration of a dosimetry system used for radiation dose assessment in cancer therapy

Abstract: An accurate calibration of the therapy level radiation dosimetry system has a pivotal role in the accuracy of dose delivery to cancer patients. The two methods used for obtaining a tissue equivalent calibration of the system: air kerma calibration and its conversion to a tissue equivalent value (absorbed dose to water) and direct calibration of the system in a water phantom, have been compared for identical irradiation geometry. It was found that the deviation between the two methods remained within a range of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The converter is situated approximately 1.5 m from the source’s center. The dose rate at the converter, measured to be approximately 49.84 R/min, has been calibrated using a PTW UNIDOS [ 20 ], with dosimetry accuracy within 2.5%. The system was exposed for a duration of 30 min to accumulate a substantial quantity of photons, ensuring the detection of a sufficient number of Compton scattered electrons for calibration purposes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The converter is situated approximately 1.5 m from the source’s center. The dose rate at the converter, measured to be approximately 49.84 R/min, has been calibrated using a PTW UNIDOS [ 20 ], with dosimetry accuracy within 2.5%. The system was exposed for a duration of 30 min to accumulate a substantial quantity of photons, ensuring the detection of a sufficient number of Compton scattered electrons for calibration purposes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dosimetric ma te ri als of differ ent types have been stud ied over the de cades to as sess their dosimetric per for mance for var i ous ra di a tion beams. Among the var i ous dosimetric sys tems, there are di a mond de tec tors [3], ion iza tion cham bers [4][5][6], scin tilla tors [7], semi con duc tor de tec tors [8], ra dio-chro mic film [9], ESR do sim e ters [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], thermoluminescent do sim e ters (TLD) [25][26][27][28], and scin til la tion do sim e ters [29]. Of ten these dosimetric sys tems are aided by Monte Carlo sim u la tions that also pro vide many de tails on the par ti cle types and en ergy spec tra [17,30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%