2002
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2002100104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Implementation Resistance Factors for DMSS Versus Other Information Systems

Abstract: Effective decision-making within and across organizations is of strategic importance as the global business environment becomes more complex. Business processes and their related computer based information systems (CBIS) must support integrated decision-making. While decision support systems (DSS), executive information systems (EIS), and knowledge-based systems (KBS) have been independently used to support problem solving and decision making activities, they are still not widely implemented and accepted by a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a review of 41 IT implementation cases identified six areas of resistance (user, task, development process, system and organizational) and proposed a conceptual model of the relationship between implementation resistance and success [33].…”
Section: Dssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a review of 41 IT implementation cases identified six areas of resistance (user, task, development process, system and organizational) and proposed a conceptual model of the relationship between implementation resistance and success [33].…”
Section: Dssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les individus qui sont motivés à utiliser les TIC, c'est-à dire, qui ont la volonté d'acquérir des connaissances, éprouvent moins de résistance (Setzekorn et al 2002).…”
Section: Motivation Des Utilisateursunclassified
“…For example, The successful implementation of any IS technology can be a very complex process (e.g. [56], [57], [58], resulting in a high rate of failure (e.g. 50-70% of failure in the case of CRM, as reported by Payton and Zahay, [59] and even 80% as reported by Storey and Barnett [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%