2014
DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-7-33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of hallux valgus angles assessed with computerised plantar pressure measurements, clinical examination and radiography in patients with diabetes

Abstract: BackgroundHallux valgus deformity is a common musculoskeletal foot disorder with a prevalence of 3.5% in adolescents to 35.7% in adults aged over 65 years. Radiographic measurements of hallux valgus angles (HVA) are considered to be the most reproducible and accurate assessment of HVA. However, in European countries, many podiatrists do not have direct access to radiographic facilities. Therefore, alternative measurements are desired. Such measurements are computerised plantar pressure measurement and clinical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because we missed the data of two participants due to technical problems, we excluded these participants from the subsequent analysis. The hallux valgus angle of the weight-bearing barefoot while standing in a parallel stance was measured at the medial contour of the right foot, which is reported to be in agreement with radiographic measurement (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.81) [21]. There were nine students with hallux valgus and eight without hallux valgus according to a criterion proposed by the previous study [12].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Because we missed the data of two participants due to technical problems, we excluded these participants from the subsequent analysis. The hallux valgus angle of the weight-bearing barefoot while standing in a parallel stance was measured at the medial contour of the right foot, which is reported to be in agreement with radiographic measurement (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.81) [21]. There were nine students with hallux valgus and eight without hallux valgus according to a criterion proposed by the previous study [12].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We believe that interventions should consider the structure of the transverse arch and the loading patterns to correct the small details. Past publications on interventions for hallux valgus depended on the severity and duration of the deformity, the level of pain, and the age of the individual [9,46], ranging from surgery to orthotics [7] and specific exercises [47]. One study mentioned foot mobilization such as: manual mobilization focusing on flexion and caudal sliding of the metatarsophalangeal joints, tarsals, subtalar and ankle joint and exercise (hallux plantar flexion strengthening exercises, hallux abduction strengthening exercises and towel curl exercise) to increase the foot's joints range of motion and toe grip strength and decrease pain [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum pressure in the normal human foot is located in the second metatarsal head, and the maximum pressure during toe‐off motion is located in the middle of forefoot; however, the plantar peak pressure for diabetes mellitus patients is located in the halluces, which is also the maximum force bearing point before toe‐off motion. The foot lateral force is significantly increased in diabetics compared with nondiabetics and is mostly concentrated outside of the forefoot The forefoot of diabetes patients is a target area for developing foot ulcers. Therefore, comparing the force difference in various plantar area regions between diabetic and nondiabetic people can provide a reference for preventing diabetic foot …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%