1994
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.1.8025741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of ganciclovir and acyclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus after lung transplantation.

Abstract: In an attempt to modify the sequelae of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after lung transplantation, 25 allograft recipients were randomized to either ganciclovir 5 mg/kg once a day 5 d/wk (Group G) or acyclovir 800 mg four times a day (Group A). All subjects received ganciclovir during postoperative Weeks 1 through 3, and they were then given either A or G regimens until Day 90. At termination of study enrollment, the cumulative incidence of all CMV infections (including seroconversions) was increased in Grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the impact of CMV on the development of BOS remains controversial, possibly due to several factors, such as the matching of CMV-seronegative recipients with CMVseronegative donors, the prospective monitoring of CMV antigenaemia as a surveillance technique for CMV infection, the use of prophylactic or pre-emptive antiviral treatments and changes in the immunosuppressive regimen, all of which may mask potential associations [44]. Several centres have reported a decreased risk of CMV in the development of BOS, either a decreased incidence or a delayed onset, after the use of CMV prophylaxis [45][46][47].…”
Section: Alloimmune-independent Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of CMV on the development of BOS remains controversial, possibly due to several factors, such as the matching of CMV-seronegative recipients with CMVseronegative donors, the prospective monitoring of CMV antigenaemia as a surveillance technique for CMV infection, the use of prophylactic or pre-emptive antiviral treatments and changes in the immunosuppressive regimen, all of which may mask potential associations [44]. Several centres have reported a decreased risk of CMV in the development of BOS, either a decreased incidence or a delayed onset, after the use of CMV prophylaxis [45][46][47].…”
Section: Alloimmune-independent Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current prophylactic approaches vary widely among different transplant programs (5,8,18,26,72,104,105,143,145,172,232,236,273,284,299,319,382,396,423,497) (Table 5). Reasons for the discrepancies reflect the absence of large, multicenter, randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of countless preventive strategies.…”
Section: Specific Antiviral Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prophylactic regimens have been studied in lung transplant recipients, including i.v. and oral GCV alone or in combination with CMV hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IVIG) (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). However, the optimal prophylactic strategy in lung transplant recipients remains controversial; the appropriate regimen and duration of therapy remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%