2011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Functional and Physical Properties of Self-Expanding Intracranial Stents [Neuroform3, Wingspan, Solitaire, Leo(+), Enterprise]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
142
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
142
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, conventional stents, especially laser-cut stents, are prone to kinking and do not adequately conform to the parent artery. 13 The LBS, with its technical features, represents an evolution in intracranial stents. The low profile of this device differentiates it from other conventional intracranial stents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, conventional stents, especially laser-cut stents, are prone to kinking and do not adequately conform to the parent artery. 13 The LBS, with its technical features, represents an evolution in intracranial stents. The low profile of this device differentiates it from other conventional intracranial stents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low radial force of stents could be one cause of poor wall apposition. Although poor wall apposition may improve by deploying closedcell stents very slowly, 8 this technique might not work in a small-sized tortuous parent artery. The stent might not fully deploy in the segment between the 2 acute angles because of kinking or ovalization at the angles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports suggested that Enterprise stents might be better suited for use in small vessels, because they show poor wall apposition in larger-diameter vessels. 5,8 The use of an Enterprise stent in a small parent artery without tortuosity might be tolerable for acute thromboembolic occlusion or in-stent restenosis. In this study, the average size of the parent arteries (1.72 ± 0.30 mm) was found to increase on follow-up angiography compared with that before the procedure (1.59 ± 0.26 mm, p = 0.037; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LEO stent can be retrieved after it has been released in 90% of cases, while the Solitaire stent is fully recoverable 39 and easier to place in an intended location. 40 In the present series of patients, only patients 7 and 9 had the opportunity to receive the Solitaire stent, for it was only available in Changhai Hospital from September 2010. The main procedure-related complication was postoperative occlusion of the branches, amounting to 22.2% in total.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%