2018
DOI: 10.1177/0954409718787045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of friction modifier performance using two laboratory test scales

Abstract: This is a repository copy of A comparison of friction modifier performance using two laboratory test scales.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High Pressure Torsion tests were performed with 5 different dosages of dry friction modifier present in the contact, these were performed at 600MPa and are shown compared to a dry baseline in Figure 20. The results in Figure 20 show that even the lowest dosage of dried friction modifier reduces the coefficient of friction from >0.8, to <0.3, similar values for friction modifiers were found at full scale tests by Buckley-Johnstone et al [25]. Each increase in the dosage of friction modifier reduced the friction levels further, until a minimum friction of around 0.1 (512 mL/mile) is reached, at which point increasing the friction modifier dosage does not result in a further drop in friction.…”
Section: Controlled Dosagessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…High Pressure Torsion tests were performed with 5 different dosages of dry friction modifier present in the contact, these were performed at 600MPa and are shown compared to a dry baseline in Figure 20. The results in Figure 20 show that even the lowest dosage of dried friction modifier reduces the coefficient of friction from >0.8, to <0.3, similar values for friction modifiers were found at full scale tests by Buckley-Johnstone et al [25]. Each increase in the dosage of friction modifier reduced the friction levels further, until a minimum friction of around 0.1 (512 mL/mile) is reached, at which point increasing the friction modifier dosage does not result in a further drop in friction.…”
Section: Controlled Dosagessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Friction value has been replotted against cycle numbers for different slip values, as shown in Figure 17. The cycles to "dry" friction compare quite well with twin disc data [8].…”
Section: Retentivity Datasupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Friction value has been replotted against cycle numbers for different slip values, as shown in Figure 17. The cycles to "dry" friction compare quite well with twin disc data [8]. There have been no direct investigations of "retentivity" in the field as this is hard to quantify.…”
Section: Retentivity Datasupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consumption part of the simulation model has been parameterized based on experimental results from two test rigs at the University of Sheffield: A twin disc rig (TDR), and a full-scale wheel-rail rig (FSR). A brief description of both rigs can be found in [32].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Model Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%