1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(95)00084-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of four tomographic methods for nuclear fuel pin analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue is addressed in Barton (1977); Honda et al (1990) and Craciunescu et al (1995). Neutron interrogation is used in the two former articles, with Barton (1977) comparing differing numbers of angles and projections in ART reconstruction in a feasibility study.…”
Section: Post Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This issue is addressed in Barton (1977); Honda et al (1990) and Craciunescu et al (1995). Neutron interrogation is used in the two former articles, with Barton (1977) comparing differing numbers of angles and projections in ART reconstruction in a feasibility study.…”
Section: Post Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Neither paper provides quantitative data upon which to base their arguments about which technology is more suited to the problem. Unlike Craciunescu et al (1995), here four methods of gamma emission tomography are compared in a simulator to ascertain which is more suited to evaluating burn-up within the fuel. The work presented utilised two phantoms and then simulated the scanning of these phantoms using the following methods: Maximum Likelihood (ML), Maximum Entropy (ME), ART, and Monte Carlo implementation of the Back Projection Technique (MCBP).…”
Section: Post Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the implementation of computer tomography, widely used in medical applications, is a noninvasive technique that can be employed successfully in the investigation of single fuel rods as well as entire fuel assemblies. This technique, although not new in nuclear fuel characterisation, [4][5][6][7][8][9] is a growing area due to the continued progress of computer science that makes possible the implementation of more sophisticated and better performing algorithms for the reconstruction of images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%