A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system

Abstract

BackgroundValidated questionnaires can support the identification of psychosocial problems by the Preventive Child Health Care (PCH) system. This study assesses the validity and added value of four scoring methods used with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for the identification of psychosocial problems among children aged 7–12 by the PCH.MethodsWe included 711 (of 814) children (response: 87%) aged 7–12 undergoing routine health assessments in nine PCH services across the Netherlands. Child health professionals interviewed and examined children and parents. Prior to the interview, parents completed the SDQ and the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL), which were not shown to the professionals. The CBCL and data about the child's current treatment status were used as criteria for the validity of the SDQ. We used four SDQ scoring approaches: an elevated SDQ Total Difficulties Score (TDS), parent-defined difficulties, an elevated score for emotional symptoms, conduct problems or hyperactivity in combination with a high impairment score, and a combined score: an elevated score for any of these three methods.ResultsThe Cohen's Kappa ranged from 0.33 to 0.64 for the four scoring methods with the CBCL scores and treatment status, generally indicating a moderate to good agreement. All four methods added significantly to the identification of problems by the PCH. Classification based on the TDS yielded results similar to more complicated methods.ConclusionThe SDQ is a valid tool for the identification of psychosocial problems by PCH. As a first step, the use of a simple classification based on the SDQ TDS is recommended.

Screening for psychopathology in child welfare: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) compared with the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA)

“…Moreover, previous research identified a lower 10% cutoff point for Dutch children [11,43]. Possibly, there is a comparable bias for Flemish children.…”

Early Findings of Preventive Child Healthcare Professionals Predict Psychosocial Problems in Preadolescence: The TRAILS Study

“…Previous research has shown that the use of validated questionnaires, training of PCH professionals in a structured method for identifying psychosocial problems, and providing more time for the assessment may improve the accuracy of this early identification. 39,40 This study may add to the improvement of the quality of early identification in routine practice by indicating the predictors for behavioral problems that should be monitored.…”

Change in parenting, change in student–teacher relationships, and oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR): Testing a gene-×-environment (G×E) hypothesis in two samples.

“…Important to appreciate is that measurement across the two studies were not identical, even if highly similar, and that policies and practices of schools in the two countries cannot be presumed to be the same. (Crone, Vogels, Hoekstra, Treffers, & Reijneveld, 2008), which was used for screening. Completed SDQs were returned by 3,358 of 3,456, families (97.2%) at the Well Child Clinics (when the child attended a routine health check for 4-year-olds).…”