1987
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(87)90055-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of cylindrical and flat plate sensors for surface wetness duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
2
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
29
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hourly average values of wetness duration and air temperature were also measured in a maize canopy at a height of 1.5 m, near the position of maize ears (total canopy height about 2.5 m). The temperature sensors were shielded thermistors and the wetness sensors followed the design of Gillespie and Duan (1987), where the presence of liquid water modifies the electrical impedance between adjacent wires wound onto a cylinder about 10 cm long and 1 cm in diameter. The cylinder was painted an appropriate shade of green to mimic the drying rate of liquid water on nearby ears.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hourly average values of wetness duration and air temperature were also measured in a maize canopy at a height of 1.5 m, near the position of maize ears (total canopy height about 2.5 m). The temperature sensors were shielded thermistors and the wetness sensors followed the design of Gillespie and Duan (1987), where the presence of liquid water modifies the electrical impedance between adjacent wires wound onto a cylinder about 10 cm long and 1 cm in diameter. The cylinder was painted an appropriate shade of green to mimic the drying rate of liquid water on nearby ears.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most electronic sensors were based on a design developed by Davis & Hughes (1970), which sensed the presence of wetness as a drop in electrical resistance across two adjacent circuits etched onto a printed-circuit board. Later workers found that coating these sensors with latex paint enhanced their sensitivity to wetness (Gillespie & Kidd, 1978;Sentelhas et al, 2004a) (Figure 1), that height and angle of deployment influenced sensitivity (Figure 2), and that electronic sensors could also be fabricated as cylinders rather than flat plates (Gillespie & Kidd, 1978;Gillespie & Duan, 1987;Lau et al, 2000;Sentelhas et al, 2004b;Sentelhas et al, 2007a). A recent innovation in flat-plate sensor design operates on the principle of electrical capacitance rather than resistance (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA, U.S.A.).…”
Section: The Challenge Of Timelinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of low alternating currents in the sensor minimizes self heating and electrolytic depositions on the wires or fingers as suggested by Gillespie & Kidd (1978) Both cylindrical and flat plate LWD sensors were white latex painted in order to increase their sensitivity to microscopic wetness droplets as well as to simulate leaf optical proprieties, following the recommendation of Gillespie & Kidd (1978) and Sentelhas et al (2004a). The sensors were submitted to an oven heat treatment at 65ºC for 12 h in order to remove the hygroscopic components of the paint, following the procedures proposed by Gillespie & Duan (1987). After this, laboratory tests were performed in order to establish a threshold of resistance, expressed by the ratio between the measured voltage and the excitation voltage provided by the data logger (Vs/Vx), for which the sensors were considered initially wet.…”
Section: Laboratory Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gillespie & Duan (1987) developed a low cost cylindrical sensor of easy construction. Its sensing surface faces a solid angle of 2π radians (360 degrees), which represents better some organs, such as stems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation