1968
DOI: 10.1177/002221946800101005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Culture Fair Test Scores with Group and Individual Intelligence Test Scores of Disadvantaged Negro Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies actually comparing the Cattell with other instruments are few and suffer from methodological difficulties. While a slight superiority in scoring has been demonstrated in one study (Willard, 1968), a marked deficit has been noted as well (Watson and Klett, 1974).The current study was based on the assumption that if the standard measures of intelligence are indeed culturally biased, the disadvantaged individuals will score lower on them than they would on a less biased instrument. If this assumption is correct, then the disadvantaged individuals should score higher on the Cattell Culture Fair than on a standard test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies actually comparing the Cattell with other instruments are few and suffer from methodological difficulties. While a slight superiority in scoring has been demonstrated in one study (Willard, 1968), a marked deficit has been noted as well (Watson and Klett, 1974).The current study was based on the assumption that if the standard measures of intelligence are indeed culturally biased, the disadvantaged individuals will score lower on them than they would on a less biased instrument. If this assumption is correct, then the disadvantaged individuals should score higher on the Cattell Culture Fair than on a standard test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Studies actually comparing the Cattell with other instruments are few and suffer from methodological difficulties. While a slight superiority in scoring has been demonstrated in one study (Willard, 1968), a marked deficit has been noted as well (Watson and Klett, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%