2009
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0b013e31818c2c89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Corneal Cellular Responses After 213-nm Compared With 193-nm Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy in Rabbits

Abstract: The more favorable cellular responses after irradiation with 213 nm compared with 193 nm wavelengths are consistent with good clinical outcomes previously reported. Ablation with a 213 nm wavelength may result in better wound healing, leading to a more reliable correction of refractive errors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo studies have shown that the 213 nm laser provides advantages in the form of a more controlled ablation site and better stability in cell numbers, implying a more predictable ablation outcome. In vitro , higher levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in corneal keratocytes irradiated with 213 nm suggest a better endogenous protection against free radicals induced by laser surgery [9]. Enucleated rabbit eyes that underwent myopic PRK using both excimer laser and solid-state laser systems showed a smooth ablation surface with no edema or distortion to adjacent corneal tissue, indicating absence of thermal damage [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vivo studies have shown that the 213 nm laser provides advantages in the form of a more controlled ablation site and better stability in cell numbers, implying a more predictable ablation outcome. In vitro , higher levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in corneal keratocytes irradiated with 213 nm suggest a better endogenous protection against free radicals induced by laser surgery [9]. Enucleated rabbit eyes that underwent myopic PRK using both excimer laser and solid-state laser systems showed a smooth ablation surface with no edema or distortion to adjacent corneal tissue, indicating absence of thermal damage [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller spot size of 0.6 mm, which is 2.5 times smaller than a typical excimer laser spot size, contributes less mechanical stress on the cornea causing less damage to the corneal structure [8, 12]. Histopathologic evidence has demonstrated a more favorable response after irradiation with 213 nm wavelength which may provide a more predictable wound healing and refractive response [9]. Furthermore, the 213 nm wavelength solid-state laser has been proven to be less sensitive to corneal hydration, limiting its effect on the final refractive outcome [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development and growing use of the 213 nm solid-state laser, published studies [1214] have suggested that despite the known differences in their ablation characteristics, clinical results in efficacy and safety have been comparable. In a study by Sanders et al, the authors showed that cellular responses after irradiation with 213 nm compared with 193 nm wavelengths are consistent with good clinical outcomes [11]. However, laser ablation of a LASIK flap presents unique problems because of delayed epithelial healing and remodeling as well as stromal changes that may have resulted from previous denervation [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could not be established yet whether 213 nm laser is more cytotoxic and/or mutagenic compared to 193 nm laser because of limited data. However, several studies have proven that corneal ablation by both 213 nm and 193 nm wavelengths produces minimal DNA damage and free radical formation [10, 11]. The 213 nm has also been determined to deliver less energy on the ablation surface, therefore producing less thermal effect than the 193 nm laser [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research on corneal wound healing mainly focuses on lasers in the ultraviolet wavelength region, such as 193, [2][3][4] 213, 5,6 and 345 nm, 7,8 due to the widespread applications of laser corneal refractive surgery. With the increasing use of infrared lasers in diverse fields, including military, medicine, and industry, concerns have been raised about the potential injuries of infrared lasers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%