A comparison of co‐participant perceptions of self and others in placement center interviews

Cheatham, T. Richard; McLaughlin, Margaret L.

doi:10.1080/01463377609369222

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, the "student report" method depends almost entirely on students' awareness of their own behaviors, their self-perceptions, and veridical perceptions of interviewees' responses. Even discounting students' motivation to present their efforts in the best light for their instructors, there is ample evidence that their self-perceptions and attributions may be inconsistent with co-participants' assessments of their interviewing behaviors (Cheatham & McLaughlin, 1976;Giedt, 1958;Nisbett & Ross, 1980;Seibold & Spitzberg, 1982).…”

Section: Instructional Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 97%

Co‐participant perceptions of information‐gathering interviews: Implications for teaching interviewing skills

Seibold

Meyers

1985

Communication Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Instructional Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 97%

Co‐participant perceptions of information‐gathering interviews: Implications for teaching interviewing skills

Seibold

Meyers

1985

Communication Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Basic communication fidelity: An extension

Powers

Love

1989

Communication Research Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interviewer and Applicant Questioning Behavior in Employment Interviews

Jablin

Miller

1990

Management Communication Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although questions represent one of the primary means of information exchange in the employment interview, empirical research exploring interview questioning has been an infrequent object of review and interpretation. This article attempts to alleviate this situation by providing a cross-disciplinary review and analysis of research related to interviewer and applicant questioning processes in the employment interview. Toward this end, our literature analysis is organized into three primary sections: (a) constraints and antecedent factors associated with asking questions in the interview; (b) characteristics of interview questions; and (c) the consequences or outcomes of questioning. Within each of these sections findings pertaining to interviewer and applicant question usage are described and critiqued. Subsequently, we discuss pragmatic implications for interview practice that can be extrapolated from our analysis of the literature. Finally, in the last section we present a number of conclusions concerning the “state of the art” of research exploring questioning in the employment interview, and we suggest directions for future research in the area.

show abstract

A comparison of co‐participant perceptions of self and others in placement center interviews

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Co‐participant perceptions of information‐gathering interviews: Implications for teaching interviewing skills

Co‐participant perceptions of information‐gathering interviews: Implications for teaching interviewing skills

Basic communication fidelity: An extension

Interviewer and Applicant Questioning Behavior in Employment Interviews

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About