A comparison of CCD and CID detection for atomic emission spectroscopy

Sweedler, Jonathan V.; Jalkian, Rafi D.; Pomeroy, Robert S.; Denton, M. Bonner

doi:10.1016/0584-8547(89)80066-7

Cited by 27 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The wavelength accuracy and precision attained in this work were much higher than those obtained in the previous study (1). However, further improvement of the wavelength precision is necessary for atomic emission spectrometry.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 54%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Rapid-Scanning Spectrometer with Wavelength Synchronization by a Laser Rotary Encoder for Versatile Applications to Atomic Emission Spectrometry

Kitagawa

Sakakibara

Tsuge

1999

Microchemical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 54%

“…Polychromators using image sensors such as a photodiode array, a charge-coupled device (CCD), or a charge injection device (CID) have been developed for simultaneous detection of spectral lines (1)(2)(3). These types of spectrometers are powerful tools in multielement analyses.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Rapid-Scanning Spectrometer with Wavelength Synchronization by a Laser Rotary Encoder for Versatile Applications to Atomic Emission Spectrometry

Kitagawa

Sakakibara

Tsuge

1999

Microchemical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The application of charge transfer devices (CTDs) was reviewed by Sweedler and coworkers [7]. Relatively to classical PMTs, CTDs possess the ability to monitor simultaneously a vast number of spectral lines and their spectral backgrounds.…”

Section: Charge Injection Devices (Cids) and Charge Coupled Devices (mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Typical configurations and applications have been described by numerous workers [3][4][5][6]. Recently, refinements in detection devices [7][8][9][10][11], versatile sample introduction systems [12], element preconcentration [13], and data processing [14][15][16] have closed the gap in the detection capability between ICP-AES and MS. Nevertheless, ICP-AES will be used mainly for the determination of major and minor elements and about 20 of the high abundance trace elements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geoanalysis using plasma spectrochemistry ? milestones and future prospects

Brenner

Zander

1996

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Highlights of plasma spectrochemistry in geoanalysis are reviewed. The techniques are evaluated in terms of recent instrumental developments, calibration strategies, spectral and matrix interferences and analytical performance. While acid decomposition results in solutions containing low salt contents, this decomposition strategy is inappropriate for numerous sample types due to poor recoveries. On the other hand, alkali fusions result in total decomposition, but solutions containing high salt contents constrain the accuracy due to interference effects in the inductively coupled plasma (ICP), the sample introduction system, and in the quadrupole mass spectrometer interface. Therefore, practical limits of determination are evaluated in terms of salt tolerances. It is concluded that ICP-atomic emission spectrometry (AES) is employed mainly for the accurate determination of the major and minor elements and the more abundant trace elements. On the other hand, ICP-mass spectrometry (MS) is used mainly for the determination of trace elements and together with the possibility of obtaining some isotopic information, it profoundly enhances the capability for solving geochemical problems. Several methods of direct solid sample introduction are described. These include direct current (DC) arc emission spectroscopy (DC-AES), slurry nebulization (SN), spark ablation (SA), laser ablation (LA) and glow discharges (GD). These devices allow direct solid analysis of bulk samples, single minerals and inclusions.

show abstract

“…This allows analysis of a virtually unlimited amount of elements in the same run. As the difference in concentration levels of different elements can be huge, the CCD/CID chips for ICP-OES are specifically developed to resist blooming or over lightning of areas close together (Sweedler et al ., 1989).…”

Section: Detector Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%