2010
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-00639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches for the prediction of true metabolizable energy of meat and bone meal

Abstract: There has been a considerable and continuous interest to develop equations for rapid and accurate prediction of the ME of meat and bone meal. In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN), a partial least squares (PLS), and a multiple linear regression (MLR) statistical method were used to predict the TME(n) of meat and bone meal based on its CP, ether extract, and ash content. The accuracy of the models was calculated by R(2) value, MS error, mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute deviation, bias, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for the m.s.e. are into the interval presented by Perai et al (2010) Table 3. However, they used a specific protein feedstuff.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The values for the m.s.e. are into the interval presented by Perai et al (2010) Table 3. However, they used a specific protein feedstuff.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group with seven data lines (three FM and four POM) were used as validation set of the ANN. Perai et al (2010) used 34 raw lines and only one feedstuff (meat and bone meal-MBM). Although Ahmadi et al (2008) and Perai et al (2010) used a small dataset, their prediction was accurate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations