The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of activated carbon remediation success in floodplain soils contaminated with DDT and its metabolites using ex situ and in situ experimentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although few studies have been conducted on terrestrial macroinvertebrates, increased survival has been observed in the majority of tests on aquatic macroinvertebrates following exposure to activated carbon amendments compared with exposure to untreated contaminated sediments (CH2M Hill, 2020; Harwood et al, 2022; Janssen & Beckingham, 2013). For example, increased survival following carbon amendments to untreated sediment was observed for the mussel Mytilus edulis , and for the detritivores A. aquaticus and G. pulex (Janssen & Beckingham, 2013; Kupryianchyk et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although few studies have been conducted on terrestrial macroinvertebrates, increased survival has been observed in the majority of tests on aquatic macroinvertebrates following exposure to activated carbon amendments compared with exposure to untreated contaminated sediments (CH2M Hill, 2020; Harwood et al, 2022; Janssen & Beckingham, 2013). For example, increased survival following carbon amendments to untreated sediment was observed for the mussel Mytilus edulis , and for the detritivores A. aquaticus and G. pulex (Janssen & Beckingham, 2013; Kupryianchyk et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the presence of hydrophobic organic contaminants in the environment, an important avenue of research is the remediation of pollutants by carbon sorbents (Duarte et al, 2018; Harwood et al, 2022; Janssen & Beckingham, 2013). In carbon sequestration, hydrophobic organic contaminants adsorb to the sequestering agent with the goal of reducing their bioavailability (Cho et al, 2007; Fagervold et al, 2010; Harwood et al, 2022; Janssen & Beckingham, 2013; Rakowska et al, 2012). One type of carbon sorbent, activated carbon, is widely applicable as an adsorbent in pollution control (Abel & Akkanen, 2019; Belhachemi, 2021; Cho et al, 2007; Fagervold et al, 2010; Ghosh et al, 2011; Harwood et al, 2022; Patmont et al, 2015; Payne et al, 2019; Rakowska et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second limitation was related to the fact that we have focused on carbon emission as a footprint for measuring global warming; future studies should also include other measures such as the air quality (PM2.5, PM10) associated with IoT sensors [97,98]. Third, our comparative study was limited to Canada and the United Kingdom, many other examples of successful case studies can be used to highlight pits and falls of sustainable development on a regional basis [99,100]. Fourth, the study did not include social media content analysis and its effects on tackling global warming issues.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%