2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-010-9444-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of 3 Digital Image Correlation Techniques on Necessarily Suboptimal Random Patterns Recorded By X-Ray

Abstract: Dynamic x-rays have been used to follow the deformation ahead of a steel ball fired into a mock-up of a generic cylindrical rocket motor. The impact was arranged to intersect a sparse lead powder layer within the mock explosive that created a random speckle pattern on x-ray film. Three different digital image correlation programs are compared to examine any sensitivity to the sub-optimal speckle pattern produced by the lead powder. An identical output data reduction method was used in all cases to aid comparis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a study on explosives could provide considerable insight into understanding the factors that affect their behavior. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In the past few decades, many efforts have been made to improve the survivability and safety of munitions, during which a new class of insensitive munitions (IM) explosives has been developed. However, these IM formulations differ somewhat from each other in a variety of aspects especially in sensitivity and stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a study on explosives could provide considerable insight into understanding the factors that affect their behavior. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In the past few decades, many efforts have been made to improve the survivability and safety of munitions, during which a new class of insensitive munitions (IM) explosives has been developed. However, these IM formulations differ somewhat from each other in a variety of aspects especially in sensitivity and stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in X-ray technology have allowed for 3D DIC to be extended to tracking the motion within objects, by seeding them with particles of significantly higher density. One example of this is a study conducted by Rae et al [20], where the authors examined the displacement ahead of a spherical projectile being fired at a mock (non-reactive) motor casing. The mock motor the authors used was made of 6061 aluminium tubing, a Sylgard 184 insulation layer and a mock explosive (PBS 9501) on the inside.…”
Section: Dic Used In Impact Studies To Measure Target Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a lack of easy optimization of the speckle size and contrast, the authors decided to compare three different correlation techniques on the X-ray images. The three correlation methods were: (i) the Vic-2D (Correlated Solutions, Inc., Irmo, SC, USA) commercial software package, (ii) making use of a fast Fourier transform to change the data to the frequency domain, with sophisticated sub-pixel image shifting to optimize the overlap between sub-images and (iii) also making use of a fast Fourier transform to perform the correlation, but utilizing a simple bi-cubic fit to find the maximum correlation peak, to find the average displacement between sub-images [20]. Rae et al found that all three correlation methods produced some valid data from the sub-optimal speckle patterns around the projectile in the case of the solid sample, but method (ii) produced poor results around the impact region for the case with the 'burn' hole [20].…”
Section: Dic Used In Impact Studies To Measure Target Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant limitation of phase-contrast x-ray imaging is that it provides extremely low signal to noise ratio images that are generally inadequate for PIV cross-correlation. Several groups have developed complex techniques to improve the quality of x-ray PIV, including optimization of experimental conditions [39] , [40] , alternative image processing algorithms [41] , and application of various correlation algorithms [38] , [42] . However, the techniques previously published are application-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%