2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between transient CFD and FEM simulations of solar central receiver tubes using molten salt and liquid metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, T present and T Fritsch are the temperatures obtained in the present work and in the work of Fritsch et al [28], respectively.…”
Section: Validation Of the Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, T present and T Fritsch are the temperatures obtained in the present work and in the work of Fritsch et al [28], respectively.…”
Section: Validation Of the Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To validate the accuracy of the simulation, the turbulent flow in a smooth tube based on the model developed by Fritsch et al [28] was considered, under uniform heat flux boundary conditions on the front side of the tube. The temperature distribution at the front side of the tube obtained in this simulation and that determined by Fritsch and coworkers [28] are shown in Figure 7. The results reveal a good agreement between these two studies.…”
Section: Validation Of the Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, numerical simulation is an effective research method [25,26]. In this work, we present a numerical simulation on the heat transfer of liquid sodium under nonuniform heat flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3]. More recently, numerical simulations also tackle non-homogeneous thermal boundary conditions [4][5][6][7][8]. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of openly available high-fidelity datasets for heat transfer in turbulent pipe flows, especially concerning low Prandtl number fluids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%