2014
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2014.11868761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between the structure in elite tennis and kids tennis on scaled courts (Tennis 10s)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The tests for significance were performed with the software SPSS 22.0. There were three test groups that were compared to each other: ATP, Lime and Greenwhereby the ATP and Green data originated from the Schmidhofer et al (2014) study and the Lime data was collected specifically for this study. The differences between the mean values for each parameter and group were analysed via one-way ANOVA with p < .05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The tests for significance were performed with the software SPSS 22.0. There were three test groups that were compared to each other: ATP, Lime and Greenwhereby the ATP and Green data originated from the Schmidhofer et al (2014) study and the Lime data was collected specifically for this study. The differences between the mean values for each parameter and group were analysed via one-way ANOVA with p < .05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The videos were used by an operator to observe and manually annotate the investigated performance parameters ( Table 2). The basic observation system and concept of analysis were borrowed from Schmidhofer et al (2014), but there are few alterations concerning the performance parameters: the parameter Return Points Won was not used because it just represents the counterpart of Serve Points Won. For specific service analyses, the parameters 1st Serve Points Won (%) and 2nd Serve Points Won (%) were combined to Total Serve Points Won (%), which is an overall indicator of the effectiveness of the serve.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations