2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between silicon nitride-based ceramic and coated carbide tools in the face milling of irregular surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Silicon nitride cutting tools have captured application in cast iron machining which had previously been exclusively served by cemented carbide and alumina-based tools (Diniz & Ferrer, 2008;Grzesik, Rech, Zak, & Claudin, 2009;Reddy, Chakraborty, Mahajan, & Prasad, 1990;Souza, Nono, Ribeiro, Machado, & Silva, 2009). While capable of several ceramic applications, Si 3 N 4 is possibly the most ideal tool material for machining gray cast iron in turning, boring, and face milling operations.…”
Section: Silicon Nitride Cutting Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silicon nitride cutting tools have captured application in cast iron machining which had previously been exclusively served by cemented carbide and alumina-based tools (Diniz & Ferrer, 2008;Grzesik, Rech, Zak, & Claudin, 2009;Reddy, Chakraborty, Mahajan, & Prasad, 1990;Souza, Nono, Ribeiro, Machado, & Silva, 2009). While capable of several ceramic applications, Si 3 N 4 is possibly the most ideal tool material for machining gray cast iron in turning, boring, and face milling operations.…”
Section: Silicon Nitride Cutting Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In machining of cast iron using high speed, sulfur produces a manganese sulfide protective layer on the cutting edge. This protective layer can decrease the abrasive wear of the tool by acting as a lubricant and increase tool life [8,9]. Gastel et al [7] stated that this protective layer can also protect the tool from oxidation and diffusion at higher cutting temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that the dominant wear mechanism for aluminum oxide-based ceramics was abrasion, while for silicon nitride-based ceramics the basic mechanism was diffusion. This comparison was made in terms of tool life and workpiece surface roughness and to understand the wear mechanism of silicon nitride-based ceramic tools and coated carbide tools in turning of ADI (Diniz et. al., 2008 andGrzesik et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%