The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2016.08.003
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between powder flow property testers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While results from RST-01 and RST-XS are in good agreement, a considerable deviation (up to 20 %) was observed when comparing results from the Schulze ring shear tester to the Jenike shear tester. Similar outputs are found by other researchers (Berry et al, 2015;Koynov et al, 2015;Salehi et al, 2017), where yield loci from the Brookfield powder flow tester, the Schulze ring shear tester, the FT4 powder rheometer and the Jenike shear tester are compared. The Brookfield powder flow tester and the FT4 powder rheometer show systematically lower shear responses in comparison to the other two shear testers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…While results from RST-01 and RST-XS are in good agreement, a considerable deviation (up to 20 %) was observed when comparing results from the Schulze ring shear tester to the Jenike shear tester. Similar outputs are found by other researchers (Berry et al, 2015;Koynov et al, 2015;Salehi et al, 2017), where yield loci from the Brookfield powder flow tester, the Schulze ring shear tester, the FT4 powder rheometer and the Jenike shear tester are compared. The Brookfield powder flow tester and the FT4 powder rheometer show systematically lower shear responses in comparison to the other two shear testers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…f) shear tester: this technique has been used to measure caking of particulate materials at room conditions or elevated temperature, humidity and consolidation stress [30][31][32]. The details of shear tester principles have been illustrated elsewhere [33]. This method is time consuming, since powder will be consolidated for a desired period of time before a single point in yield locus line can be measured.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unconfined yield strength in powder shear tester is a property derived from the static yield locus through the determination of the unconfined yield Mohr circle. This parameter, therefore, is a combined function of the material cohesion, c, and also of the static angle of internal friction, ϕ[33]. These parameters are reported inTable 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leturia M. et al (2014) have convincingly shown that one or more appropriate measurement techniques should often be applied in order to get an understanding of the product's flow properties under realistic conditions. Surprisingly, Salehi H. et al (2017) have recently shown that even similar methodologies working with the conventional Jenike shear and ring shear principle can provide inconsistent results. This all makes a reliable assessment of the powder flow properties a complicated task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%